According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the new deficit-reduction plan from several Democrats on the Gang of 12 marks a dramatic departure from traditional Democratic positions — and actually stands well to the right of plans by the co-chairs of the bipartisan Bowles-Simpson commission and the Senate's "Gang of Six," and even further to the right of the plan by the bipartisan Rivlin-Domenici commission. See the side-by-side comparison in two tables below.
Table 1:
COMPARISON OF DEFICIT-REDUCTION PROPOSALS Savings in Billions of Dollars, 2012-2021, Relative to Current-Policy Baseline |
|||
Bowles-Simpson
|
Gang
of Six
|
Democratic
Offer1
|
|
Revenue Increases
|
2,238
|
2,064
|
1,300
|
Medicare and Medicaid2
|
402
|
500
|
475
|
Other Mandatory Programs3
(including chained-CPI proposal) |
364
|
373
|
385
|
Discretionary4
|
1,295
|
1,165
|
1,300
|
Subtotal, Spending Cuts
|
2,061
|
2,038
|
2,160
|
Debt Service Savings
|
796
|
783
|
664
|
Deficit Reduction
|
5,095
|
4,885
|
4,124
|
1 Figures for the Democratic offer
do not include economic stimulus proposals, the details of which are not
available but apparently include both temporary tax-cut measures (like an
extended payroll tax reduction) and temporary spending increases (like an extension
of federal unemployment benefits).
2 The Gang of Six plan showed two alternative levels of health cuts, $500 billion and $383 billion.
3 The Bowles-Simpson plan includes
the cost of repealing CLASS, whose implementation has now been suspended by
the Administration.
4 The Democratic offer is adjusted to include $900 billion in discretionary savings enacted in the April continuing resolution and the Budget Control Act, for comparability with the other two plans. The Fiscal Commission and the Gang of Six plans measure discretionary savings relative to CBO's March baseline. Sources: Estimates for Bowles-Simpson plan are from Moment of Truth Project, Updated Estimates of the Fiscal Commission Proposal, June 29, 2011. Estimates for the Gang of Six plan are from material provided by staff. Estimates for the Democratic offer are based on press accounts. Estimates have been adjusted by CBPP staff to put them on a comparable basis. |
|||
Table 2:
COMPARISON OF DEFICIT-REDUCTION PROPOSAL Savings in Billions of Dollars, 2012-2021, Relative to Fiscal Commission's Plausible Baseline |
|||
Bowles-Simpson
|
Gang
of Six
|
Democratic
Offer 1
|
|
Revenue Increases
|
1,372
|
1,198
|
434
|
Medicare and Medicaid2
|
402
|
500
|
475
|
Other Mandatory Programs3
(including chained-CPI proposal) |
364
|
373
|
385
|
Discretionary4
|
1,295
|
1,165
|
1,300
|
Subtotal, Spending Cuts
|
2,061
|
2,038
|
2,160
|
Debt Service Savings
|
621
|
608
|
489
|
Deficit Reduction
|
4,054
|
3,844
|
3,083
|
1 Figures for the Democratic offer
do not include economic stimulus proposals, the details of which are not
available but apparently include both temporary tax-cut measures (like an
extended payroll tax reduction) and temporary spending increases (like an extension
of federal unemployment benefits).
2 The Gang of Six plan showed two alternative levels of health cuts, $500 billion and $383 billion.
3 The Bowles-Simpson plan includes
the cost of repealing CLASS, whose implementation has now been suspended by
the Administration.
4 The Democratic offer is adjusted to include $900 billion in discretionary savings enacted in the April continuing resolution and the Budget Control Act, for comparability with the other two plans. The Fiscal Commission and the Gang of Six plans measure discretionary savings relative to CBO's March baseline. Sources: Estimates for Bowles-Simpson plan are from Moment of Truth Project, Updated Estimates of the Fiscal Commission Proposal, June 29, 2011. Estimates for the Gang of Six plan are from material provided by staff. Estimates for the Democratic offer are based on press accounts. Estimates have been adjusted by CBPP staff to put them on a comparable basis. |
|||
No comments:
Post a Comment